Find the metric or system
Use By Metric to inspect a metric across systems or By Device to inspect the metrics for a system. Search and inspector filters narrow the current view; the device view also offers a company filter. Use pagination to reach later results. Do not treat the visible page as the entire integration or assume the global company selector scopes this tenant integration view. Open a row to inspect its details. Compare the value, status, company/system identity and Last Evaluated time. Summary pass/fail/warning counts describe imported evaluations; Linked describes a mapping, not a successful compliance assessment.
Use By Metric to compare a metric across systems, or By Device to inspect a system.
Create a linked check
Open an unlinked metric
Review the check details
Choose automatic evaluation
Create and verify
Understand evaluation
In native mode, Liongard Pass becomes the positive compliance outcome. Fail, Warning, an unknown status, or a missing status on an available metric value becomes the negative outcome. The compliance bridge does not preserve a third Warning outcome even though the imported metrics view displays warnings. Custom rules run from top to bottom; the first match wins. If no rules match supplies the fallback and initially defaults to Fail.12 → Pass, then keep the fallback Fail. This does not let a missing or nonnumeric value pass through a default Pass result. Validate the provider’s actual value format before applying any example to an assessment.
If no stored custom rules are available, the bridge falls back to native status evaluation. Selecting Custom rules alone is not evidence that custom comparisons ran.
Understand automatic updates
Updates run through background synchronization. They depend on saved mappings, Auto-update, available metric values, a suitable status list and system/device/company matching. They are not a real-time or fixed completion-time guarantee.- Device checks: linked systems identify devices for individual evaluation. The bridge can create missing device-check assignments in active runs for the matching company, as well as update existing assignments. Consider all active runs for that company before enabling this automation.
- Company-level assignments: the bridge chooses a metric value using the worst imported native status for that company, then evaluates that selected value. With custom rules, this is not an evaluation of every value followed by the worst custom-rule result.
- No matching metric data: the assignment can be skipped; no change is not evidence of a new Pass.
- Completed runs: this bridge skips them. That does not establish that all application features make completed assessments immutable.
Frequently asked questions
Is a Linked badge proof that the compliance check passed?
Is a Linked badge proof that the compliance check passed?
Does a Liongard Warning remain Warning in compliance?
Does a Liongard Warning remain Warning in compliance?
What happens when none of my custom rules match?
What happens when none of my custom rules match?
Are Equals and Contains case-insensitive?
Are Equals and Contains case-insensitive?
Can the bridge add checks to active runs?
Can the bridge add checks to active runs?
Does company-level evaluation test every device against my custom rules?
Does company-level evaluation test every device against my custom rules?
Does no data mean the check passes?
Does no data mean the check passes?
Can I rely on the creation toast to confirm all custom rules saved?
Can I rely on the creation toast to confirm all custom rules saved?
Are completed runs updated by the Liongard bridge?
Are completed runs updated by the Liongard bridge?